Original Research
Occupational Health & Mental Health

Predicting Burnout and Psychological Distress Risks of Hospital Healthcare Workers

Summary

Burnout among healthcare workers has emerged as a critical occupational health concern globally, with evidence suggesting that it compromises both worker wellbeing and patient safety. In Malaysia, national reports have estimated that approximately 26.5% of junior doctors experience burnout, with those working less than six months being particularly vulnerable. Despite the growing recognition of this problem, research examining the risk factors across different healthcare occupations and specialties in Asian settings has remained limited.

This cross-sectional study, published in the Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, investigated the risk factors associated with burnout and psychological distress among healthcare workers from diverse medical specialties and occupations within an urban general hospital in Malaysia. A total of 368 participants were recruited, including doctors, nurses, assistant medical officers, and hospital attendants from major medical and surgical departments.

Methodology

Participants completed self-administered questionnaires comprising three components: demographic information, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The MBI-HSS measures three dimensions of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal accomplishment. The DASS provides measures of depression, anxiety, and stress as indicators of psychological distress. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent predictors of burnout and psychological distress while adjusting for potential confounders.

Occupational Differences in Burnout Risk

The fully adjusted multivariate analyses revealed striking occupational differences in burnout susceptibility. Doctors were approximately four to five times more likely than other occupational groups to experience emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation. This finding is consistent with international literature documenting the particular vulnerability of physicians to burnout, which has been attributed to factors including long working hours, high patient loads, administrative burden, and the emotional demands of medical decision-making.

Nurses, assistant medical officers, and hospital attendants showed varying risk profiles, suggesting that burnout interventions should be tailored to the specific stressors and work conditions of different healthcare roles rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

Departmental Differences

Workers in the paediatric department demonstrated markedly elevated risks across multiple psychological distress domains. The odds of depression were more than three times higher (aOR 3.105, 95% CI: 1.043–9.243), anxiety risk was approximately 3.5 times greater (aOR 3.517, 95% CI: 1.194–10.356), and stress risk was over five times higher (aOR 5.404, 95% CI: 1.628–17.942) compared to workers in other departments.

The particularly high stress levels in paediatric settings likely reflect the emotional intensity of caring for sick children, the demands of communicating with distressed families, and the moral distress associated with paediatric illness and mortality. These findings have important implications for targeted wellbeing support in paediatric healthcare settings.

Bidirectional Relationship Between Burnout and Distress

The study identified a bidirectional relationship between burnout and psychological distress. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation were associated with higher risks of psychological distress, while stress independently predicted higher risks of burnout. This cyclical pattern suggests that burnout and psychological distress may reinforce each other, creating a downward spiral that is difficult to interrupt without systematic intervention.

Implications for Healthcare Management

These findings underscore the need for Malaysian hospital administrators to implement targeted burnout prevention programmes, with particular attention to doctors and paediatric department staff. Evidence-based interventions may include reducing administrative burden, ensuring adequate staffing levels, providing regular psychological support and debriefing sessions, and creating organisational cultures that de-stigmatise help-seeking behaviour. The bidirectional relationship between burnout and psychological distress suggests that early intervention at either point could help prevent the escalating cycle of occupational ill-health.

Limitations

As a cross-sectional study conducted in a single urban general hospital, causal relationships cannot be established, and the findings may not be generalisable to rural or smaller healthcare facilities. Self-reported measures may be influenced by response bias, and the relatively modest sample size within specific occupational and departmental subgroups may limit the precision of estimates. Future longitudinal research across multiple centres would strengthen these findings.

← Back to MJPHM Homepage